Fury


Jeremy hates watching Republican speeches with me. I hate watching Republican speeches with me. I squirm and gesticulate, trying to keep my protests on mute and either failing or else turning red and exploding with the effort. Oh and then following up my outrage with a blog post.

Clearly the Republican convention was not going to have a good effect on me. There they are, willingly misunderstanding and misrepresenting, waving their flags and chanting ‘we built it’ as if it means something (when really, if you look at its origin, it absolutely does not). But for the majority of it I’m able to sit back and relax in my socialist communist bubble (did I tell you I got called a communist this summer? All because I listen to NPR. Unsurprisingly by the same relative who told me the UK has a higher murder rate than the US) while I watch the spectacle of the thing. Until they get to talking about the American Dream that is, and Mitt Romney’s “Opportunity Society”  (that one was a while ago but I’m still smarting), and then I find myself dreaming of outrage and then writing a blog post.

First, let me say this: I don’t have anything against the American Dream. It makes for much less of a class focused culture – none of that disdain for ‘new money’ and far less of the general snobbery we have in England where accent and parentage dictate class even more so than profession or accomplishment. The belief that America is a country where success out of nothing is possible, is a good belief.

Except where it isn’t.

Because where, for me, apoplexy sets in and I have to go to bed or risk bursting a few blood vessels, is when people get all smug about the American dream and talk endlessly about how hard they had it growing up but look at where they are today. It’s not exactly that I have anything  against those people – well done etc – but I absolutely have something against the blindness that says ‘my family made it, therefore, everyone can make it if they work hard enough so we really don’t need to support them in any  other way’.

For example, Marco Rubio’s speech last night. He spoke of how his parents came over from Cuba with nothing and invested everything they could into their kids so that they could have the opportunities their parents never had and, oh look, there he is on the RNC stage.

And what I say to that is, yes:  if parents are able, have the capacity to, invest everything – their love and time and money (but mostly their love) – into their children then the possibility for success is absolutely there. But for so many, poverty is toxic. It lives alongside addiction and violence and the sort of trauma that makes people unable to fully connect and engage  with other people, with their children. Meaning that they’re unable to give them the love and care they need to grow into adults who can then do the same for their children. In the job I do, going into homeless family shelters and supporting volunteers who play with the kids, I've seen that it's absolutely possible for a parent to shield their child from the trauma of living in a congregate shelter - where nothing is your own and all space is shared and all sorts of things happen right outside the bedroom door - but only if that parent has the capacity to absorb and deflect and maintain calm and love and presence in their child's life. For most though, because of their own history, childhood and circumstance, that just isn't possible and the children are just there un-shielded alongside their parents, experiencing their fear, vulnerability and uncertainty as if it were their own, because it is and because in all likelihood it will be. 

 I’m not saying that this presents an impossible situation where nobody born into that can escape. I am saying that it demands those who are out of it, who have had the privilege of being loved and well-fed and housed, of having been raised into adulthood, to do something to help. To create programs that mean those less privileged children have access to decent education and health care and food, to nurture and counsel their parents out of addiction or despair and into jobs. To do all of the things the Republicans seem to think they shouldn’t need to do because opportunity is just hanging around, waiting to be grasped.

The stubborn blindness of it makes me so incredibly sad.

OK, I think I’m done now.

3 comments:

  1. I agree with everything you say. Except that the prejudice against 'new money' has historically also been an issue in the US, and the bias against it has still not entirely disappeared. It's nothing like the level of class-obsession in the UK, of course, but I feel that that particular aspect of the American dream is not without its caveats.
    But then, I studied social history and vote liberal, so I'm probably a communist with nothing of merit to say as well.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I totally agree that class is still a thing over here and I can imagine certain communities being pretty snobby about 'new money' (not that I have any contact with those communities, because they'd also be snobby about me!). I guess I'm just coming at in from an English perspective where you are so defined by accent and origin that breaking out of any class is practically impossible, whereas here it seems like it might be possible to some extent, even if you wouldn't be granted access to the Connecticut wasp society...!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Preaching to the choir, my friend. Going from a council estate state school to Cambridge = five, erm, interesting years among the terminally posh. I seriously considered adopting a staunch Somerset accent...

    ReplyDelete